Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOittinen, Vesa
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-23T12:30:01Z
dc.date.available2023-05-23T12:30:01Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/63065
dc.description.abstractThe turbulent events of Stalin’s ‘Great Break’ have often been seen as a turning point and the beginning of a Stalinist politics sensu stricto. A sharp philosophical debate occurred at this turning point. This chapter discusses how this shift occurred in Soviet Marxist philosophical circles. It analyses the concept of ‘Menshevising Idealism’, an idea coined (maybe by Stalin himself) during the philosophical campaign around the year 1930. It targeted mainly the Deborin school of early Soviet philosophy. Deborin and his supporters were accused of ‘Hegelianising’ Marxism and of not understanding the significance of the new, Leninist stage of Marxist theory. The concept of Menshevising Idealism has later almost unanimously been viewed by scholars as a Stalinist label without any real content. While it is true that Stalin and his circle utilised the campaign against the Deborinites for their own purposes, there nevertheless were some real weaknesses in the philosophy of the Deborin School. One sign of this weakness is that such thinkers as Georg Lukács, Mikhail Lifshits and, later, Evald Ilyenkov all criticised the Deborin School even though they did not accept the Stalinist methods of its suppression.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and governmenten_US
dc.subject.otherMenshevising Idealism, Deborin, Stalinism, Ilyenkov, Lifshits, Lukácsen_US
dc.titleChapter 4 ‘Menshevising Idealism’ and Stalinisation of Philosophyen_US
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.4324/9781003219835-4en_US
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bben_US
oapen.relation.isPartOfBookc916d3f0-5a2c-4767-afc5-5bca002dff41en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9781032114200en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9781032114217en_US
oapen.imprintRoutledgeen_US
oapen.pages18en_US
oapen.remark.publicFunder name: University of Helsinki
peerreview.anonymitySingle-anonymised
peerreview.idbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityPublisher
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.review.typeProposal
peerreview.reviewer.typeInternal editor
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.titleProposal review
oapen.review.commentsTaylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required).


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record