Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorvan Tuinen, Sjoerd
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-19T08:47:43Z
dc.date.available2023-07-19T08:47:43Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/63996
dc.description.abstractDrawing upon a wide variety of authors, approaches, and ideological contexts, this book offers a comprehensive and detailed critique of the distinct and polemical senses in which the concept of ressentiment (and its cognate 'resentment') is used today. It also proposes a new mode of addressing ressentiment in which critique and polemics no longer set the tone: care. Contemporary tendencies in political culture such as neoliberalism, nationalism, populism, identity politics, and large-scale conspiracy theories have led to the return of the concept of ressentiment in armchair political analysis. This book argues that, due to the tension between its enormous descriptive power and its mutually contradicting ideological performances, it is necessary to ‘redramatize’ the concept of ressentiment. By what right do we possess and use the concept of ressentiment, and what makes the phenomenon worth knowing? Inspired by Marxist political epistemology, affect theory, postcolonialism, and feminism, the book maps, delimits, and assesses four irreducible ways in which ressentiment can be articulated: the ways of the priest, the physician, the witness, and the diplomat. The first perspective is typically embodied by conservative (Scheler, Girard) and liberal (Smith, Rawls) political theory; the second, by Nietzsche, Deleuze and Foucault; whereas the standpoint of the witness is found in the writings of Améry, Fanon and Adorno; and the diplomat’s is the author’s own, albeit inspired by philosophers such as Ahmed, Stiegler, Stengers, and Sloterdijk. In producing a dialectical sequence between all four typical modes of enunciation, the book demonstrates how the first three reinterpretations of ressentiment are already implied in the theater set up in Nietzsche’s late polemical books, while the fourth proposes a line of flight out of it. The Dialectic of Ressentiment will be of interest to scholars and advanced students working in critical theory, social and political philosophy, cultural studies, sociology, history, literature, political science, anthropology, and Nietzsche scholarship. It will also appeal to anyone interested in the politics of anger, discourse ethics, trauma studies, and memory politics. The Open Access version of this book, available at www.taylorfrancis.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 license.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDH Philosophical traditions and schools of thought::QDHR Western philosophy from c 1800en_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDH Philosophical traditions and schools of thoughten_US
dc.subject.otheraffect;authenticity;biopolitics;common sense;compositionism;cosmopolitics;critical theory;critiques of neoliberalism;cultural history;democracy;dialectics;envy;feminism;genealogy;good sense;justice;media culture;modernity;phenomenology;polemics;political concepts;political epistemology;populism;postcolonialism;power;psychologization;resentment;ressentiment;right versus fact;Sjoerd van Tuinenen_US
dc.titleThe Dialectic of Ressentimenten_US
dc.title.alternativePedagogy of a Concepten_US
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.4324/9781003384250en_US
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bben_US
oapen.relation.isFundedBy78685a97-a622-47b3-b5c2-35de8aa1354aen_US
oapen.relation.isbn9781032470214en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9781032470221en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9781003384250en_US
oapen.imprintRoutledgeen_US
oapen.pages323en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record