Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSmillie, Susie
dc.contributor.authorRiddell, Julie
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-27T11:38:43Z
dc.date.available2023-07-27T11:38:43Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/64099
dc.description.abstractConducting research that is emotionally demanding can negatively impact the health and wellbeing of researchers if adequate planning and support is not in place. Institutions are rigorous in their requirement for research proposals to consider physical health and safety risks to participants and researchers, and emotional risks to participants. There is less requirement for proposals to consider how the research might be emotionally demanding for those conducting it, and how this might affect them. Researchers in social and public health science at University of Glasgow identified a local need for a more consistent approach to considering emotional impact on researchers when planning, conducting, and disseminating research, and developed guidance addressing this need. This paper shares the process of, and findings from, staff consultation carried out in advance of writing guidance on ‘Facilitating and Supporting Emotionally Demanding Research’, the recommendations made within this guidance, and steps the authors have taken since then to develop a peer support network in Scotland. en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JM Psychology::JMB Psychological methodologyen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology::JHB Sociology::JHBC Social research and statisticsen_US
dc.subject.otherresearcher vulnerability; vulnerability in research; research ethics; when research goes wrong; transformative learning; moments in research; vulnerability of the researcher; researchers in vulnerable positions; researcher protection; protecting researchers; harnessing vulnerability; personal research experiences; autoethnography; qualitative research; qualitative methods; vulnerability in qualitative researchen_US
dc.titleChapter 4 Supporting Emotionally Demanding Researchen_US
dc.title.alternativeDeveloping Guidance for a University Research Centreen_US
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.4324/9781003349266-6en_US
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bben_US
oapen.relation.isPartOfBook2e9b7aea-7f0f-4d58-ab4d-342d0f79cad8en_US
oapen.relation.isFundedBy0b939896-7c25-4504-90d0-8e40954322daen_US
oapen.relation.isbn9781032393292en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9781032393339en_US
oapen.imprintRoutledgeen_US
oapen.pages18en_US
peerreview.anonymitySingle-anonymised
peerreview.idbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityPublisher
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.review.typeProposal
peerreview.reviewer.typeInternal editor
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.titleProposal review
oapen.review.commentsTaylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required).


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record