Show simple item record

dc.contributor.editorGöbel, Marie
dc.contributor.editorNiederberger, Andreas
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-27T13:05:47Z
dc.date.available2023-07-27T13:05:47Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/64104
dc.description.abstractThis volume offers a systematic philosophical analysis of the normative challenges facing European refugee policy, focusing on whether the response to it can be based on European values. By considering the refugee policy through the lens of European values, cosmopolitan norms and universal human rights, the contributions expose the weaknesses and limitations of existing regulations and make proposals on how to improve them. The EU is often seen as a cosmopolitan project. Europe is supposed to be a community of states that aspires to be guided by cosmopolitan norms. However, the idea of a cosmopolitan Europe has never been unanimously shared, and in recent years, it has come under increasing scrutiny, particularly with regard to the EU’s refugee policy. The guiding idea of this book is that a deeper philosophical understanding of the normative issues at stake can foster greater conceptual clarity and enrich political debates on the future of European refugee policy. The first part of the book revolves around the question of whether the rise in refugee numbers over the past decade has led to a crisis in the EU and, if so, how this crisis relates to or impacts European values. The second part traces the history of the discourse on “European values” and examines from a philosophical perspective how we can plausibly understand these values in terms of their moral grammar, their normative content and their implications for the behaviour of the EU and its member states. Finally, the third part puts forth recommendations for a feasible and normatively more compelling European refugee policy based on human rights, human dignity, justice and democratic self-determination as the decisive normative requirements. Cosmopolitan Norms and European Values: Ethical Perspectives on Europe’s Refugee Policy will be of interest to researchers and advanced students working in ethics, political philosophy, political science, social sciences and law.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRoutledge Studies in Contemporary Philosophyen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDT Topics in philosophy::QDTS Social and political philosophyen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government::JPQ Central / national / federal government::JPQB Central / national / federal government policiesen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and governmenten_US
dc.subject.otherAndreas Niederberger;cosmopolitanism;EU asylum system;EU refugee policy;European cosmopolitanism;European values;identity politics;Jos Philips;Marcus Düwell;Marie Göbel;Martin Deleixhe;Matthias Hoesch;migration policy;moral obligations;normative powers;norms;Philipp Schink;Regina Polak;refugee crisis;Therese Herrmannen_US
dc.titleCosmopolitan Norms and European Valuesen_US
dc.title.alternativeEthical Perspectives on Europe's Refugee Policyen_US
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.4324/9781003245278en_US
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bben_US
oapen.relation.isFundedBy178e65b9-dd53-4922-b85c-0aaa74fce079en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9781032156750en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9781003245278en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9781032122335en_US
oapen.collectionEuropean Research Council (ERC)en_US
oapen.imprintRoutledgeen_US
oapen.pages240en_US
oapen.grant.number770330
oapen.grant.projectNoVaMigra
peerreview.anonymitySingle-anonymised
peerreview.idbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityPublisher
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.review.typeProposal
peerreview.reviewer.typeInternal editor
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.titleProposal review
oapen.review.commentsTaylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required).


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record