Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKeen, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorGoldberg, Suzanne
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-27T13:57:06Z
dc.date.available2023-07-27T13:57:06Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.identifierONIX_20230727_9780472086450_22
dc.identifierOCN: 732605524
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/64130
dc.description.abstractIn 1992, the voters of Colorado passed a ballot initiative amending the state constitution to prevent the state or any local government from adopting any law or policy that protected a person with a homosexual, lesbian, or bisexual orientation from discrimination. This amendment was immediately challenged in the courts as a denial of equal protection of the laws under the United States Constitution. This litigation ultimately led to a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court invalidating the Colorado ballot initiative. Suzanne Goldberg, an attorney involved in the case from the beginning on behalf of the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, and Lisa Keen, a journalist who covered the initiative campaign and litigation, tell the story of this case, providing an inside view of this complex and important litigation.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JB Society and culture: general::JBS Social groups, communities and identities::JBSF Gender studies, gender groupsen_US
dc.subject.otherLaw
dc.subject.otherSexuality Studies
dc.subject.otherPolitical Science - American Politics
dc.titleStrangers to the Law
dc.title.alternativeGay People on Trial
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.3998/mpub.14593
oapen.relation.isPublishedBye07ce9b5-7a46-4096-8f0c-bc1920e3d889
oapen.relation.isFundedByb5941080-3f20-4864-95c6-753acff7c9f4
oapen.relation.isbn9780472086450
oapen.relation.isbn9780472904174
oapen.collectionBig Ten Open Books
oapen.place.publicationAnn Arbor
oapen.grant.number[...]
oapen.grant.programBig Ten Open Books
oapen.grant.projectBig Ten Open Books — Gender and Sexuality Studies Collection
peerreview.anonymityDouble-anonymised
peerreview.idd98bf225-990a-4ac4-acf4-fd7bf0dfb00c
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityScientific or Editorial Board
peerreview.review.decisionYes
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.review.typeFull text
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.titleExternal Review of Whole Manuscript
oapen.review.commentsThe proposal was selected by the acquisitions editor who invited a full manuscript. The full manuscript was reviewed by two external readers using a double-blind process. Based on the acquisitions editor recommendation, the external reviews, and their own analysis, the Executive Committee (Editorial Board) of U-M Press approved the project for publication.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record