Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThompson, Ashley
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-07T09:47:03Z
dc.date.available2023-08-07T09:47:03Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/75015
dc.description.abstractThis chapter will look beyond Cambodia as we know it today in geographic terms, and beyond the early 13th century, to highlight legacies of Angkor beyond Angkor on the Southeast Asian mainland (see Figure 32.1). To begin this exploration, allow me to point out the discreetly deceptive premises of this chapter’s title: that we all, author and readers alike, share established understandings of what Angkor was as of what a legacy is. Alas, we cannot pretend to stand on such firm ground. Instead, with reference to the opening epigraphs, I propose a working definition of Angkor as legacy. The conceptual assimilation of ‘Angkor’ and ‘legacy’ is of course another temporising gloss on empire: where the present, commemorating what has been as a means of heralding what will be, is always already gaining time for itself.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NK Archaeologyen_US
dc.subject.otherAngkorian, Asiaen_US
dc.titleChapter 32 Mainland Southeast Asia After Angkoren_US
dc.title.alternativeOn the Legacies of Jayavarman VIIen_US
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.4324/9781351128940-39en_US
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bben_US
oapen.relation.isPartOfBook32b568fe-a657-44e4-984f-295706fcf819en_US
oapen.relation.isFundedBy02c39681-1742-423f-aca2-f0fe21e278c5en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9780815355953en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9781032439266en_US
oapen.imprintRoutledgeen_US
oapen.pages19en_US
oapen.remark.publicFunder name: SOAS University of London
peerreview.anonymitySingle-anonymised
peerreview.idbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityPublisher
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.review.typeProposal
peerreview.reviewer.typeInternal editor
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.titleProposal review
oapen.review.commentsTaylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required).


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record