Chapter 15 Aldous Huxley and the Rebels against Happiness
Proposal review
dc.contributor.author | Farrell, John | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-28T15:01:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-28T15:01:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/75853 | |
dc.description.abstract | Huxley’s vision of juvenile happiness kept in place by genetic engineering, compulsory promiscuity, psychological conditioning, drugs, and propaganda has been traditionally read as a warning against the dangers to modern freedom. Huxley would seem, then, to be a strong defender of the heroic protest against utopia. In fact, Huxley believed that most of the measures taken by the World State, including eugenics, would be necessary in some form, and his narrative strongly ironizes the resisters to utopian happiness. Unable to grasp either horn of the utopian dilemma, he produced a lucid and memorable version of it. | en_US |
dc.language | English | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Utopia, Dystopia, Dostoevsky, Huxley, Orwell | en_US |
dc.title | Chapter 15 Aldous Huxley and the Rebels against Happiness | en_US |
dc.type | chapter | |
oapen.identifier.doi | 10.4324/9781003365945-16 | en_US |
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | 7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bb | en_US |
oapen.relation.isPartOfBook | ad5acb7b-34e6-45de-b9e2-bec54e0b68fb | en_US |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9781032431574 | en_US |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9781032431581 | en_US |
oapen.imprint | Routledge | en_US |
oapen.pages | 15 | en_US |
oapen.remark.public | Funder name: The Gould Center at CMC | |
peerreview.anonymity | Single-anonymised | |
peerreview.id | bc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1 | |
peerreview.open.review | No | |
peerreview.publish.responsibility | Publisher | |
peerreview.review.stage | Pre-publication | |
peerreview.review.type | Proposal | |
peerreview.reviewer.type | Internal editor | |
peerreview.reviewer.type | External peer reviewer | |
peerreview.title | Proposal review | |
oapen.review.comments | Taylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required). |