Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWright, Claire
dc.contributor.authorTomaselli, Alexandra
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-28T15:32:43Z
dc.date.available2023-08-28T15:32:43Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/75857
dc.description.abstractThis conclusion presents some closing thoughts on the concepts covered in the preceding chapters of this book. The book deals with an important conceptual question: how useful is the “implementation gap” as an approach to understanding Indigenous rights? It describes the active participation of Indigenous organisations in multilateral negotiations over the creation of international documents – particularly the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples – but their somewhat limited impact on the scope of participation, consultation, and consent in the texts finally adopted by States. The book shows that Environmental Impact Assessments – which should in theory help to protect Indigenous Peoples’ interests – in fact account for many deficiencies in consultations over the extraction of natural resources in Bolivia, given that they fail to identify all impacts and reflect the government’s pro-extraction bias.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subject.otherconsultation rights, FPIC, Free, Prior and Informed consent, indigenous, Indigenous communities, Indigenous consultation, indigenous prior consultation, Indigenous rights, Indigenous threats, latin america, prior consultationen_US
dc.titleChapter 18 From the implementation gap to Indigenous empowermenten_US
dc.title.alternativePrior consultation in Latin Americaen_US
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.4324/9781351042109-25en_US
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bben_US
oapen.relation.isPartOfBookc171e6e9-e4c4-4b4c-b093-72a1ba2702f6en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9781138488069en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9780367784379en_US
oapen.imprintRoutledgeen_US
oapen.pages13en_US
oapen.remark.publicFunder name: Eurac Research
peerreview.anonymitySingle-anonymised
peerreview.idbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityPublisher
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.review.typeProposal
peerreview.reviewer.typeInternal editor
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.titleProposal review
oapen.review.commentsTaylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required).


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record