Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarberà, Gemma
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-27T12:40:34Z
dc.date.available2023-09-27T12:40:34Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/76454
dc.description.abstractWhile definiteness encodes the information that the sender assumes that the addressee has, specificity encodes the knowledge that the sender has and the anchoring to an item. The chapter focuses on lexical determiners and non-manual marking. As the example below shows, the use of this sign does not have a pejorative meaning, as it can be used in a context where the discourse referent helps the sender. The reading in corresponds to an epistemically specific discourse referent, which is thus identifiable by the sender. The reading in corresponds to an epistemically non-specific and unidentifiable discourse referent. Definiteness and specificity are two interrelated but independent notions. Sign languages are provided with a rich array of lexical signs expressing indefiniteness, but to the best of my knowledge, only few lexical signs have been claimed so far to be specialized for a definiteness.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subject.otherExperimental, handbook, language, phonological, research, sign, theoretical, comprehension, conventions, interrogatives,en_US
dc.titleChapter 18 Specificity and Definitenessen_US
dc.title.alternativeTheoretical perspectivesen_US
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.4324/9781315754499-18en_US
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bben_US
oapen.relation.isPartOfBook3f085e74-5c1f-431c-932e-b2c6d6a41db3en_US
oapen.relation.isFundedBy8ece0728-d36b-453a-b443-5923b97c04c3en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9781138801998en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9780367640996en_US
oapen.imprintRoutledgeen_US
oapen.pages21en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record