Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRentetzi , Maria
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-09T11:01:12Z
dc.date.available2023-11-09T11:01:12Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/79421
dc.description.abstractNature was called on to justify what was based on social stereotypes and gender preconceptions ever since the Cold War. Gender discrimination in the US space programme indeed has a long history. Imaging phantoms simulating the human body or parts of it played that exact role. Right after the Second World War, the International Commission on Radiation Protection recognized the need to formulate a set of standard biological parameters, describing the “average individual,” that could be used to calculate permissible radiation doses for those working with radionuclides. Designing artefacts such as spacesuits based on the universal and the standard, reinforces the importance of physicality and justifies exclusion. It prescribes femininity as much as it does masculinity, both in the singular. For long, the history of technology has focused on artefacts as technical entities and scrutinized the role of inventors, engineers, scientists, corporations, the state, regulators, the press, and of course users and consumers.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subject.otherGender studies; feminist new materialism; gendered objects; history of science;material culture; technoscienceen_US
dc.titleChapter Introductionen_US
dc.title.alternativeGendering Thingsen_US
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.4324/ 9781003379225- 1en_US
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bben_US
oapen.relation.isPartOfBooke403d4fd-e5d0-469a-9d03-577f44c2a809en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9781032459097en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9781032459127en_US
oapen.imprintRoutledgeen_US
oapen.pages21en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record