Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHvorecký, Juraj
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-16T09:21:42Z
dc.date.available2023-11-16T09:21:42Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/85152
dc.description.abstractThis chapter evaluates some basic assumptions behind the “dual” theories of phenomenal consciousness and finds them problematic for at least some examples of conscious episodes. Because the dual theories claim to be universalist in nature, even small number of counterexamples damages their status. I will present evidence, both empirical and conceptual, that demonstrates untenability of the dualist assumptions that conscious phenomenality and its unconscious counterpart possess essentially the same qualities. In doing so, I will primarily attack the claim that is shared by many dual theorists that the procedure responsible for bringing phenomenal content into consciousness serves this sole function and does not influence phenomenal qualities of content. I use the term orthogonality, first introduced in Vosgerau et al. (2008), as a convenient shortcut for the conception in which consciousness and content come unproblematically apart. I will conclude by hinting at an alternative proposal that explains emergence of conscious phenomenality as a single step operation.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subject.otherattention; higher-order theories of consciousness; inattentional blindness; masking; mental qualities; neurophenomenal structuralism; phenomenal content; unconscious mental statesen_US
dc.titleChapter 10 Troubles with the Orthogonality Thesisen_US
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.4324/ 9781003409526- 13en_US
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bben_US
oapen.relation.isPartOfBook6b30f474-9a85-45a4-9234-2473310182a0en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9781032529790en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9781032529745en_US
oapen.imprintRoutledgeen_US
oapen.pages12en_US
oapen.remark.publicThis Chapter was funded by EU grant No. CZ.02.2.69/0.0/0.0/18_054/0014626
peerreview.anonymitySingle-anonymised
peerreview.idbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityPublisher
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.review.typeProposal
peerreview.reviewer.typeInternal editor
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.titleProposal review


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record