Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRadley, Ben
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-17T13:59:33Z
dc.date.available2023-11-17T13:59:33Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/85208
dc.description.abstractBy the 2010s, the view that state mismanagement and inefficiencies underlay the Congo’s economic malaise had become so commonplace as to permeate nearly all thinking about development in the country. The aim of this chapter is to challenge this line of thinking and question the Consensus wisdom of moving from domestic-owned to foreign-owned industrial mining based on a belief in the superior efficiency of the latter. By charting the rise and fall of Belgian-owned SOMINKI (1976-1997) and Canadian-owned Banro (1995-2019) in eastern Congo, its main line of argument is that foreign-owned and managed mining corporations are no less vulnerable to mismanagement, firm inefficiencies, and volatile prices than their state-owned counterparts. This included, in the case of Banro, rent-seeking behaviour, redirecting value to overseas directors and shareholders at the expense of productive capacity and to the detriment of the Congolese state and Congolese firms and labour.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subject.otherCongo, South Kivu, mining, industrialization, development, corporations, financialization, golden_US
dc.titleChapter 3 Foreign mining corporations on trialen_US
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.1093/oso/9780192849052.003.0003en_US
oapen.relation.isPublishedByb9501915-cdee-4f2a-8030-9c0b187854b2en_US
oapen.relation.isPartOfBook953bcd3f-aaf2-4015-a8cc-d43b971569a7en_US
oapen.relation.isFundedBy84e52f9c-d514-4584-b971-0adf2e420297en_US
oapen.pages22en_US
oapen.place.publicationOxforden_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record