Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDEL PRETE, Antonella
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-27T17:12:32Z
dc.date.available2023-11-27T17:12:32Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifierONIX_20231127_9791221501698_8
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/85598
dc.description.abstractPierre-Sylvain Régis’s Cartesianism is quite singular in seventeenth-century French philosophy. Though, can we speak of a form of experimental science in Régis’s work? After exploring his notions of ‘system’ and ‘hypothesis’, I will define his position in relation to Claude Perrault, Jacques Rohault, and the Royal Society. I argue, first, that the contrasts which traverse French science are not so much about the use of experiments but about whether or not observational data can be traced back to hypotheses and to a coherent system. Secondly, that we can detect a significant similarity between Boyle’s positions and the views expressed by Perrault and also by Régis. Lastly, that French science, even in its Cartesian version, is much more probabilistic than English experimental philosophy.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofseriesKnowledge and its Histories
dc.subject.otherPierre-Sylvain Régis
dc.subject.othersystem
dc.subject.otherhypothesis
dc.subject.otherexperimental natural philosophy
dc.subject.otherspeculative natural philosophy
dc.subject.otherClaude Perrault
dc.titleChapter System, Hypothesis, and Experiments: Pierre-Sylvain Régis
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0169-8.09
oapen.relation.isPublishedBybf65d21a-78e5-4ba2-983a-dbfa90962870
oapen.relation.isbn9791221501698
oapen.series.number1
oapen.pages14
oapen.place.publicationFlorence


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record