Chapter 2 Viking camps: A historiographical overview
Proposal review
| dc.contributor.author | Williams, Gareth | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-28T10:56:51Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-28T10:56:51Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/85642 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper presents a broad-reaching overview of the study of Viking camps, and how this has developed since the 1970s. The paper considers how the camps have been interpreted in the past, summarises the evidence of the individual sites which have been investigated, and draws out a number of key themes which have emerged in recent research on the subject, both in this volume and elsewhere. | en_US |
| dc.language | English | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | Viking Camps, Ireland, England, Sweden, Frankia, Iberia, winter camps, Viking military camps, Viking Encampment, viking economy, archaeology, Viking archaeology, history, Viking Studies. | en_US |
| dc.title | Chapter 2 Viking camps: A historiographical overview | en_US |
| dc.type | chapter | |
| oapen.identifier.doi | 10.4324/9781003347682-3 | en_US |
| oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | 7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bb | en_US |
| oapen.relation.isPartOfBook | ce31e1dd-1d3e-4136-99a6-c5950f137e03 | en_US |
| oapen.relation.isFundedBy | 96d9ad63-1967-4a66-87d4-739c095ebc2e | en_US |
| oapen.relation.isbn | 9781032389493 | en_US |
| oapen.relation.isbn | 9781032389530 | en_US |
| oapen.imprint | Routledge | en_US |
| oapen.pages | 56 | en_US |
| peerreview.anonymity | Single-anonymised | |
| peerreview.id | bc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1 | |
| peerreview.open.review | No | |
| peerreview.publish.responsibility | Publisher | |
| peerreview.review.stage | Pre-publication | |
| peerreview.review.type | Proposal | |
| peerreview.reviewer.type | Internal editor | |
| peerreview.reviewer.type | External peer reviewer | |
| peerreview.title | Proposal review | |
| oapen.review.comments | Taylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required). |
