Left-Kantianism in the Marburg School
dc.contributor.author | Widmer, Elisabeth Theresia | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-23T13:31:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-02-23T13:31:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.identifier | ONIX_20240223_9783111331843_81 | |
dc.identifier | OCN: 1409702151 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/87884 | |
dc.description.abstract | Widmer sheds light on a neglected aspect of the Western philosophical tradition. Following an era of Hegelianism, the members of the neo-Kantian "Marburg School," such as Friedrich Albert Lange, Hermann Cohen, Rudolf Stammler, Paul Natorp, and Ernst Cassirer defended socialism or left-wing ideals on Kantian principles. In doing so, Widmer breaks with two mistaken assumptions. First, Widmer demonstrates that the left-Hegelian and Marxist traditions were not the only significant philosophical sources of socialist critique in nineteenth-century Germany, as the left-Kantians identified problems of normativity that the left-Hegelians could not adequately address. Second, Widmer challenges the prevailing assumption that the political philosophies developed in the Marburg School can be comprehensively characterized as a unified school of "ethical socialism." By showing that they varied fundamentally regarding their political views and their philosophical foundations of socialism, Widmer fills a gap in the studies of neo-Kantianism that is long overdue. ; Widmer sheds light on a neglected aspect of the Western philosophical tradition. Following an era of Hegelianism, the members of the neo-Kantian "Marburg School," such as Friedrich Albert Lange, Hermann Cohen, Rudolf Stammler, Paul Natorp, and Ernst Cassirer defended socialism or left-wing ideals on Kantian principles. In doing so, Widmer breaks with two mistaken assumptions. First, Widmer demonstrates that the left-Hegelian and Marxist traditions were not the only significant philosophical sources of socialist critique in nineteenth-century Germany, as the left-Kantians identified problems of normativity that the left-Hegelians could not adequately address. Second, Widmer challenges the prevailing assumption that the political philosophies developed in the Marburg School can be comprehensively characterized as a unified school of "ethical socialism." By showing that they varied fundamentally regarding their political views and their philosophical foundations of socialism, Widmer fills a gap in the studies of neo-Kantianism that is long overdue. | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | New Studies in the History and Historiography of Philosophy | |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDH Philosophical traditions and schools of thought | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDH Philosophical traditions and schools of thought::QDHR Western philosophy from c 1800 | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Neo-Kantianismus | |
dc.subject.other | soziales und politisches Denken | |
dc.subject.other | Alternativen zum Marxismus | |
dc.subject.other | Geschichte der westlichen Philosophie | |
dc.subject.other | Neo-Kantianism | |
dc.subject.other | social and political thought | |
dc.subject.other | alternatives to Marxism | |
dc.subject.other | history of western philosophy | |
dc.title | Left-Kantianism in the Marburg School | |
dc.type | book | |
oapen.identifier.doi | 10.1515/9783111331843 | |
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | 2b386f62-fc18-4108-bcf1-ade3ed4cf2f3 | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9783111331843 | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9783111331904 | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9783111331775 | |
oapen.imprint | De Gruyter | |
oapen.series.number | 13 | |
oapen.pages | 154 | |
oapen.place.publication | Berlin/Boston |