Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWidmer, Elisabeth Theresia
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T13:31:26Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T13:31:26Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifierONIX_20240223_9783111331843_81
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/87884
dc.description.abstractWidmer sheds light on a neglected aspect of the Western philosophical tradition. Following an era of Hegelianism, the members of the neo-Kantian "Marburg School," such as Friedrich Albert Lange, Hermann Cohen, Rudolf Stammler, Paul Natorp, and Ernst Cassirer defended socialism or left-wing ideals on Kantian principles. In doing so, Widmer breaks with two mistaken assumptions. First, Widmer demonstrates that the left-Hegelian and Marxist traditions were not the only significant philosophical sources of socialist critique in nineteenth-century Germany, as the left-Kantians identified problems of normativity that the left-Hegelians could not adequately address. Second, Widmer challenges the prevailing assumption that the political philosophies developed in the Marburg School can be comprehensively characterized as a unified school of "ethical socialism." By showing that they varied fundamentally regarding their political views and their philosophical foundations of socialism, Widmer fills a gap in the studies of neo-Kantianism that is long overdue. ; Widmer sheds light on a neglected aspect of the Western philosophical tradition. Following an era of Hegelianism, the members of the neo-Kantian "Marburg School," such as Friedrich Albert Lange, Hermann Cohen, Rudolf Stammler, Paul Natorp, and Ernst Cassirer defended socialism or left-wing ideals on Kantian principles. In doing so, Widmer breaks with two mistaken assumptions. First, Widmer demonstrates that the left-Hegelian and Marxist traditions were not the only significant philosophical sources of socialist critique in nineteenth-century Germany, as the left-Kantians identified problems of normativity that the left-Hegelians could not adequately address. Second, Widmer challenges the prevailing assumption that the political philosophies developed in the Marburg School can be comprehensively characterized as a unified school of "ethical socialism." By showing that they varied fundamentally regarding their political views and their philosophical foundations of socialism, Widmer fills a gap in the studies of neo-Kantianism that is long overdue.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNew Studies in the History and Historiography of Philosophy
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDH Philosophical traditions and schools of thoughten_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDH Philosophical traditions and schools of thought::QDHR Western philosophy from c 1800en_US
dc.subject.otherNeo-Kantianismus
dc.subject.othersoziales und politisches Denken
dc.subject.otherAlternativen zum Marxismus
dc.subject.otherGeschichte der westlichen Philosophie
dc.subject.otherNeo-Kantianism
dc.subject.othersocial and political thought
dc.subject.otheralternatives to Marxism
dc.subject.otherhistory of western philosophy
dc.titleLeft-Kantianism in the Marburg School
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.1515/9783111331843
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2b386f62-fc18-4108-bcf1-ade3ed4cf2f3
oapen.relation.isbn9783111331843
oapen.relation.isbn9783111331904
oapen.relation.isbn9783111331775
oapen.imprintDe Gruyter
oapen.series.number13
oapen.pages154
oapen.place.publicationBerlin/Boston


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record