Mass-Elite Representation Gap in Old and New Democracies
External Review of Whole Manuscript
Critical Junctures and Elite Agency
| dc.contributor.editor | Shim, Jaemin | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-26T12:20:17Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-06-26T12:20:17Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/91092 | |
| dc.description.abstract | How can we explain policy preference mismatch between voters and their representatives? | en_US |
| dc.language | English | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | New Comparative Politics | en_US |
| dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government | en_US |
| dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government::JPB Comparative politics | en_US |
| dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government::JPH Political structure and processes::JPHF Elections and referenda / suffrage | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | Representation, Issue congruence, Opinion congruence, Preference gap, Critical juncture, Elite agency, Political division, Political cleavage, Political dimension, Historical institutionalism, Mass-elite, Polarization, Party competition, Politicization, Democratic transition, Global approach, New democracies, Japan, Tunisia, Indonesia, Bulgaria, Political sociology, Party politics, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, South America | en_US |
| dc.title | Mass-Elite Representation Gap in Old and New Democracies | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | Critical Junctures and Elite Agency | en_US |
| dc.type | book | |
| oapen.identifier.doi | 10.3998/mpub.12776814 | en_US |
| oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | e07ce9b5-7a46-4096-8f0c-bc1920e3d889 | en_US |
| oapen.relation.isbn | 9780472076949 | en_US |
| oapen.relation.isbn | 9780472056941 | en_US |
| oapen.pages | 281 | en_US |
| peerreview.anonymity | Double-anonymised | |
| peerreview.id | d98bf225-990a-4ac4-acf4-fd7bf0dfb00c | |
| peerreview.open.review | No | |
| peerreview.publish.responsibility | Scientific or Editorial Board | |
| peerreview.review.decision | Yes | |
| peerreview.review.stage | Pre-publication | |
| peerreview.review.type | Full text | |
| peerreview.reviewer.type | External peer reviewer | |
| peerreview.title | External Review of Whole Manuscript | |
| oapen.review.comments | The proposal was selected by the acquisitions editor who invited a full manuscript. The full manuscript was reviewed by two external readers using a double-blind process. Based on the acquisitions editor recommendation, the external reviews, and their own analysis, the Executive Committee (Editorial Board) of U-M Press approved the project for publication. |
