Bloße Streite um Worte
Eine Fallstudie zur Debatte um personale Identität
dc.contributor.author | Knoll, Viktoria | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-11T15:26:04Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-11T15:26:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.identifier | ONIX_20240711_9783111382869_45 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1862-1147 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/92184 | |
dc.language | German | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Ideen & Argumente | |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDT Topics in philosophy::QDTJ Philosophy: metaphysics and ontology | |
dc.subject.other | arguing over words | |
dc.subject.other | personal identity | |
dc.subject.other | metaphilosophy | |
dc.subject.other | verbal disputes | |
dc.title | Bloße Streite um Worte | |
dc.title.alternative | Eine Fallstudie zur Debatte um personale Identität | |
dc.type | book | |
oapen.abstract.otherlanguage | Philosophical discourses can fail in different ways and for different reasons. If disputants are involved in a mere dispute over words, their dispute is not based on disagreement. Due to a linguistic misunderstanding, they just talk past each other. In its first part, this book outlines for the first time a detailed theory of mere disputes over words. What characterizes such unsuccessful disputes? And what evidence can support the suspicion of a mere dispute over words in philosophy? In the second part of the book, the author then applies the results obtained in a case study to the debate about personal identity. | |
oapen.identifier.doi | 10.1515/9783111382869 | |
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | 2b386f62-fc18-4108-bcf1-ade3ed4cf2f3 | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9783111382869 | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9783111382258 | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9783111382999 | |
oapen.imprint | De Gruyter | |
oapen.pages | 250 | |
oapen.place.publication | Berlin/Boston |