Beyond the River, Under the Eye of Rome
External Review of Whole Manuscript
dc.contributor.author | Hart, Timothy C | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-27T11:32:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-27T11:32:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/92888 | |
dc.description.abstract | Beyond the River, Under the Eye of Rome presents the Danube frontier of the Roman empire as the central stage for many of the most important political and military events of Roman history, from Trajan’s invasion of Dacia and the Marcomannic Wars, to the humbling of the Roman state power at the hands of the Goths and Huns. Hart delves into the cultural and political impacts of Rome’s interactions with Transdanubian peoples, emphasizing the Sarmatians of the Hungarian Plain, whose long encounter with the Roman Empire, he argues, created a problematic template for later dealings with Goths and Huns based on misapplied ethnographic and ecological tropes. Beyond the River, Under the Eye of Rome explores how Roman stereotypical perceptions of specific Danubian peoples directly influenced some of the most politically significant events of Roman antiquity. Drawing on textual, inscriptional, and archaeological evidence, Hart illustrates how Roman ethnic and ecological stereotypes were employed in the Danubian borderland to support the imperial frontier edifice fundamentally at odds with the region’s natural topography. Distorted Roman perceptions of these Danubian neighbors resulted in disastrous mismanagement of border wars and migrant crises throughout the first five centuries CE. Beyond the River demonstrates how state-supported stereotypes, when coupled with Roman military and economic power, exerted strong influences on the social structures and evolving group identities of the peoples dwelling in the borderland. | en_US |
dc.language | English | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHD European history::NHDA European history: the Romans | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::D Biography, Literature and Literary studies::DS Literature: history and criticism::DSB Literary studies: general::DSBB Literary studies: ancient, classical and medieval | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Roman history, Danube, Borderland history, Environmental history, Social history, Archaeology, Roman ethnography, Roman geographers, Scythians, Scythia, Sarmatians, Goths, Marcomannic Wars, Crisis of the Third Century, Battle of Adrianople, Attila, Roman limes, Herodotus, Ovid, Pliny the Elder, Strabo, Cassius Dio, Ammianus Marcellinus, Olympiodorus of Thebes, Dexippus, Themistius, Julian the Apostate, Valens, Alaric, Trajan, Marcus Aurelius, Constantine, Cernjachov culture, Settlement archaeology, Bioarchaeology, Ancient foodways, Geography, Carpathian mountains, Dacia, Hungarian Plain, Tisza river, Pannonia, Moesia, Dobruja, Getae, Column of Marcus Aurelius, Antonine Plague, Numismatics | en_US |
dc.title | Beyond the River, Under the Eye of Rome | en_US |
dc.type | book | |
oapen.identifier.doi | 10.3998/mpub.11453670 | en_US |
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | e07ce9b5-7a46-4096-8f0c-bc1920e3d889 | en_US |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9780472133536 | en_US |
oapen.pages | 369 | en_US |
peerreview.anonymity | Double-anonymised | |
peerreview.id | d98bf225-990a-4ac4-acf4-fd7bf0dfb00c | |
peerreview.open.review | No | |
peerreview.publish.responsibility | Scientific or Editorial Board | |
peerreview.review.decision | Yes | |
peerreview.review.stage | Pre-publication | |
peerreview.review.type | Full text | |
peerreview.reviewer.type | External peer reviewer | |
peerreview.title | External Review of Whole Manuscript | |
oapen.review.comments | The proposal was selected by the acquisitions editor who invited a full manuscript. The full manuscript was reviewed by two external readers using a double-blind process. Based on the acquisitions editor recommendation, the external reviews, and their own analysis, the Executive Committee (Editorial Board) of U-M Press approved the project for publication. |