Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCasale, Davide
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-20T12:50:54Z
dc.date.available2024-12-20T12:50:54Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifierONIX_20241220_9791221505078_553
dc.identifier.issn2704-5919
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/96761
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudi e saggi
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNH Employment and labour law: general
dc.subject.otherSocial security
dc.subject.otherquasi dependant workers
dc.subject.otheromissions of compulsory contributions payment
dc.subject.otherpublic coverage of pensions’ funding
dc.titleChapter L’automaticità previdenziale negata dalla Cassazione agli incolpevoli collaboratori
dc.typechapter
oapen.abstract.otherlanguageThis paper critically examines the case law of Italian Supreme Court of Cassation that denies quasi dependant workers the application of the legal protection issuing public coverage of contributions’ omissions caused by principals who do not pay pension’s compulsory contributions due to INPS (which is the main Italian social security authority). This protection is set out in Article 2116 of the Italian Civil Code, for the case of insolvency and of undeclared work. According to the author, this case law is based on a construction that is inconsistent with the textual tenor of the law and, moreover, it does not take into account the similarity of factual conditions between quasi dependant workers and employees, to whom this legal protection applies.
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0507-8.15
oapen.relation.isPublishedBybf65d21a-78e5-4ba2-983a-dbfa90962870
oapen.relation.isbn9791221505078
oapen.series.number259
oapen.pages17
oapen.place.publicationFlorence


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record