Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCESTER, CARLO
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-20T12:50:56Z
dc.date.available2024-12-20T12:50:56Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifierONIX_20241220_9791221505078_554
dc.identifier.issn2704-5919
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/96762
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudi e saggi
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNH Employment and labour law: general
dc.subject.otherConstitutional legitimacy issues
dc.subject.othercollective dismissals
dc.subject.otherviolation of selection criteria
dc.subject.otherconsequences
dc.subject.otherindividual dismissals
dc.subject.othernullity not explicitly provided for
dc.titleChapter Ancora due interventi della Corte costituzionale sul regime sanzionatorio del licenziamento illegittimo
dc.typechapter
oapen.abstract.otherlanguageThe article discusses two recent Constitutional Court rulings, nos. 7 and 22 of 2024, concerning sanctions against unlawful dismissals. The first decision rejected the constitutional challenge (also in relation to European law) regarding the exclusion of reinstatement in cases of unlawful collective dismissals due to a violation of the selection criteria among workers, as provided by Article 18 of Law no. 300/1970. In the second ruling, however, the Court declared the unconstitutionality of the provision in Legislative Decree no. 23/2015 (Jobs Act), which allowed reinstatement only when nullity was explicitly provided for by law. The author generally agrees with both rulings, albeit with some clarifications.
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0507-8.16
oapen.relation.isPublishedBybf65d21a-78e5-4ba2-983a-dbfa90962870
oapen.relation.isbn9791221505078
oapen.series.number259
oapen.pages16
oapen.place.publicationFlorence


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record