Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorD'ONGHIA, MADIA
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-20T12:51:04Z
dc.date.available2024-12-20T12:51:04Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifierONIX_20241220_9791221505078_557
dc.identifier.issn2704-5919
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/96765
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudi e saggi
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNH Employment and labour law: general
dc.subject.otherFormalism
dc.subject.otherwritten form
dc.subject.otherprotective function
dc.subject.othermandatory rule scherme
dc.titleChapter Il formalismo come tecnica di controllo (debole) dell’autonomia privata e alternativa (soft) all’inderogabilità
dc.typechapter
oapen.abstract.otherlanguageThe essay focuses on the use of the written form in labor law (especially with reference to the genesis of the relationship), also to test the validity of formalism as a technique for protecting the worker's contractual weakness and limiting individual autonomy in the face of decline of the technique of inderogability. The A. demonstrates how over time the protective function of the formal constraint has weakened which, where prescribed, mostly serves to guarantee interests of a general nature and to satisfy the need for certainty of the rules; it is, therefore, a formalism that is entirely functional to information efficiency but certainly not to effectively guarantee the worker. Hence the importance of Riccardo Del Punta's invitation to use those regulatory techniques most functional to the defense of the values of labor law.
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0507-8.19
oapen.relation.isPublishedBybf65d21a-78e5-4ba2-983a-dbfa90962870
oapen.relation.isbn9791221505078
oapen.series.number259
oapen.pages16
oapen.place.publicationFlorence


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record