Chapter Sulle distorsioni giuslavoristiche della prospettiva rimediale

dc.contributor.author	Nogler, Luca
dc.date.accessioned	2024-12-20T12:52:40Z
dc.date.available	2024-12-20T12:52:40Z
dc.date.issued	2024
dc.identifier	ONIX_20241220_9791221505078_592
dc.identifier.issn	2704-5919
dc.identifier.uri	https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/96800
dc.language	Italian
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Studi e saggi
dc.subject.classification	thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNH Employment and labour law: general
dc.subject.other	Remedies
dc.subject.other	definitions
dc.subject.other	case law
dc.subject.other	subordination
dc.subject.other	principle of employment protection
dc.title	Chapter Sulle distorsioni giuslavoristiche della prospettiva rimediale
dc.type	chapter
oapen.abstract.otherlanguage	After distinguishing between the remedial conception of law and remedialist ideology, the author criticises that part of employment law doctrine that has recently argued that employment law analysis should put the focus on facts in brackets and concentrate only on discipline. This approach results in the tyranny of the principle of employment protection (Article 35 of the italian Constitution) and provokes a reaction of legalistic positivism that imprisons the italian employment law discourse within a dead-end track.
oapen.identifier.doi	10.36253/979-12-215-0507-8.54
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy	bf65d21a-78e5-4ba2-983a-dbfa90962870
oapen.relation.isbn	9791221505078
oapen.series.number	259
oapen.pages	25
oapen.place.publication	Florence