Story Tech
External Review of Whole Manuscript
Power, Storytelling, and Social Change Advocacy
dc.contributor.author | Trevisan, Filippo | |
dc.contributor.author | Vaughan, Michael | |
dc.contributor.author | Vromen, Ariadne | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-17T11:31:10Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-02-17T11:31:10Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/98677 | |
dc.description.abstract | Personal stories have the power to stir the heart, compel us to act, and spark social change. While advocacy organizations have long used storytelling in campaigns, the role technology plays has increased. Today, invitations to “share your story” are widespread on advocacy organizations and political campaign websites, calls to action, and social media pages. But what happens after one clicks “share”? And how does this affect which voices we hear—and which we don’t—in public discourse? Story Tech explores the increasingly influential impact of technologies—such as databases, algorithms, and digital story banks—that are usually invisible to the public. It shows that hidden “story tech” enables political organizations to treat stories as data that can be queried for storylines and used to intervene in news and information cycles in real time. In particular, the authors review successful story-centered campaigns that helped change dominant narratives on disability rights, marriage equality, and essential workers’ rights in the United States and Australia. They compare the use of storytelling advocacy across different types of organizations including volunteer grassroots groups, large national advocacy coalitions, and trade unions, and examine how trends differ for storytellers, organizers, and their technology partners. As political stories shift to being “on demand,” they reshape power relationships in key public debates in ways that produce moments of tension as well as positive narrative change. Story Tech examines these trends and illustrates how storytelling success can—and should—be achieved in conjunction with personal dignity, privacy, and empowerment for storytellers and their communities, particularly marginalized ones. | en_US |
dc.language | English | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JB Society and culture: general::JBC Cultural and media studies::JBCT Media studies | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government::JPW Political activism / Political engagement | en_US |
dc.subject.other | storytelling, personal stories, technology, advocacy, activism, power, grassroots, social change, narrative change, political agency, crowdsourcing, datafication, algorithms, databases, collective action, connective action, social movements, trade unions, organized labor, disability rights, LGBTQI rights, essential workers | en_US |
dc.title | Story Tech | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Power, Storytelling, and Social Change Advocacy | en_US |
dc.type | book | |
oapen.identifier.doi | 10.3998/mpub.12067961 | en_US |
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | e07ce9b5-7a46-4096-8f0c-bc1920e3d889 | en_US |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9780472077250 | en_US |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9780472057252 | en_US |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9780472222070 | en_US |
oapen.pages | 262 | en_US |
oapen.remark.public | Funder name: The Eugene B. Power Fund | |
peerreview.anonymity | Double-anonymised | |
peerreview.id | d98bf225-990a-4ac4-acf4-fd7bf0dfb00c | |
peerreview.open.review | No | |
peerreview.publish.responsibility | Scientific or Editorial Board | |
peerreview.review.decision | Yes | |
peerreview.review.stage | Pre-publication | |
peerreview.review.type | Full text | |
peerreview.reviewer.type | External peer reviewer | |
peerreview.title | External Review of Whole Manuscript | |
oapen.review.comments | The proposal was selected by the acquisitions editor who invited a full manuscript. The full manuscript was reviewed by two external readers using a double-blind process. Based on the acquisitions editor recommendation, the external reviews, and their own analysis, the Executive Committee (Editorial Board) of U-M Press approved the project for publication. |