Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBadré, Michel
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-04T16:58:54Z
dc.date.available2025-03-04T16:58:54Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifierONIX_20250304_9782759240418_13
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/99178
dc.languageFrench
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::R Earth Sciences, Geography, Environment, Planning::RN The environment::RNA Environmentalist thought and ideology
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::R Earth Sciences, Geography, Environment, Planning::RN The environment::RNB Environmentalist, conservationist and Green organizations
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government::JPP Public administration
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government::JPV Political control and freedoms
dc.subject.otherPollution
dc.subject.otherwaste management
dc.subject.otherterritories and rural areas
dc.subject.otherbiodiversity
dc.subject.otherflora
dc.subject.otherfauna
dc.subject.othersustainable developmen
dc.subject.otherlegislation
dc.subject.otherregulation
dc.titleLa démocratie environnementale face à la réalité
dc.title.alternativeExpertises et concertations
dc.typebook
oapen.abstract.otherlanguageIn our democratic society, how is the right to access information and participate in the preparation of decisions on major projects exercised? How does the exercise of these rights fit into the decision-making process? The answers provided to these questions in the conduct of three sensitive projects, the subject of lively social debate, are described here: the mediation set up in 2017 by the government on the Notre-Dame-des-Landes airport project, the 2019 public debate on the radioactive materials and waste management plan, and the 2023 public debate on the launch of two new EPR2 nuclear reactors at Penly. Michel Badré was involved in the debates on all three projects, in a position of independence from the decision-makers and stakeholders in favor of or opposed to the projects under discussion. What he offers here is personal feedback rather than theoretical reflection. His analysis shows that a shared understanding of the technical and social issues at stake, in all their complexity, makes these debates effective. It takes time, but it's the key to finding solutions that are accepted by society, and that meet the environmental challenges of our time.
oapen.identifier.doi10.35690/978-2-7592-4042-5
oapen.relation.isPublishedBycbfd5ca7-4770-45de-b843-250d98ebf251
oapen.relation.isbn9782759240418
oapen.relation.isbn9782759240425
oapen.relation.isbn9782759240432
oapen.pages108


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record