How States Respond to Crisis : Pandemic Governance Across the Global South

Abstract

We expect the state to matter in times of crisis, and for more ‘capable’ or ‘stronger’ states to better provide for and protect their populations. But how is it, precisely, that the quality of the state matters? This volume speaks to this question through comparative study of how diverse states in the Global South responded to the COVID-19 pandemic, the largest global crisis in recent memory. Bringing together insights from quantitative cross-country analysis and detailed country case studies, this volume analyses the ways in which the quality of the state—in terms of its capacity, authority, and legitimacy—affected pandemic governance and health outcomes. Overall, while the significance of state capacity to deliver public services in effective pandemic response is clear, so too is striking variation among states lacking ‘strong’ capacity. State legitimacy and authority shed light on this variation, linked in particular to the degree to which governments’ responses were evidence-based versus politically driven, and the tenor of citizen compliance with and government enforcement of public health regulations. Seven case study chapters authored by leading scholars of each country provide deep and specific insight into these relationships in Bolivia, Ghana, Nicaragua, Peru, the Philippines, Tanzania, and Vietnam. Extending beyond a literature on the state based heavily on the study of Global North contexts, this volume sheds new light on the nature of the state and its role in crisis response and development.