Logo Oapen
  • Join
    • Deposit
    • For Librarians
    • For Publishers
    • For Researchers
    • Funders
    • Resources
    • OAPEN
        View Item 
        •   OAPEN Home
        • View Item
        •   OAPEN Home
        • View Item
        JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

        The Imperial Style of Inquiry in Twentieth-Century China

        The Emergence of New Approaches

        Thumbnail
        Download PDF Viewer
        Web Shop
        Author(s)
        Munro, Donald J.
        Language
        English
        Show full item record
        Abstract
        How have traditional Chinese ways of thinking affected problem solving in this century? The traditional, imperial style of inquiry is associated with the belief that the universe is a coherent, internally structured unity understandable through the similarly structured human mind. It involves a reliance on antecedent and authoritarian models, coupled with an introspective focus in investigations, at some cost to objective fact gathering. In contrast, emergent forms of inquiry are guided by the values of individual autonomy and new perspectives on objectivity. In the 1930s and 1940s, some liberal educators held the model of Western science in great esteem, and some scientists practicing objective inquiry helped to create an awareness in the urban areas of inquiry not directed by political values. Drawing on philosophical, social science, and popular culture materials, Donald Munro shows that the two strains coexisted in twentieth century China as mixed motives. Many important figures were motivated by a desire to act consistently with the social values associated with the premodern or received view of knowledge and inquiry. At the same time, these people often had other motives, such as utilitarian values, efficiency, and entrepreneurship. Munro argues that while many competing positions can coexist in the same person, the seeds of the positive, instrumental value of individual autonomy in Chinese inquiry are beginning to compete in both scholarly and popular culture with other, older approaches.
        URI
        https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/41562
        Keywords
        Society and social sciences; Veterinary medicine: infectious diseases and therapeutics; Medical anthropology
        DOI
        10.3998/mpub.19105
        Publisher
        University of Michigan Press
        Publisher website
        https://www.press.umich.edu/
        Publication date and place
        2020
        Grantor
        • National Endowment for the Humanities - [grantnumber unknown]
        Imprint
        U OF M CENTER FOR CHINESE STUDIES
        Series
        Michigan Monographs In Chinese Studies, 72
        Pages
        159
        Rights
        https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
        • Imported or submitted locally

        Browse

        All of OAPENSubjectsPublishersLanguagesCollections

        My Account

        LoginRegister

        Export

        Repository metadata
        Logo Oapen
        • For Librarians
        • For Publishers
        • For Researchers
        • Funders
        • Resources
        • OAPEN

        Newsletter

        • Subscribe to our newsletter
        • view our news archive

        Follow us on

        License

        • If not noted otherwise all contents are available under Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

        Credits

        • logo EU
        • This project received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 683680, 810640, 871069 and 964352.

        OAPEN is based in the Netherlands, with its registered office in the National Library in The Hague.

        Director: Niels Stern

        Address:
        OAPEN Foundation
        Prins Willem-Alexanderhof 5
        2595 BE The Hague
        Postal address:
        OAPEN Foundation
        P.O. Box 90407
        2509 LK The Hague

        Websites:
        OAPEN Home: www.oapen.org
        OAPEN Library: library.oapen.org
        DOAB: www.doabooks.org

         

         

        Export search results

        The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Differen formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

        A logged-in user can export up to 15000 items. If you're not logged in, you can export no more than 500 items.

        To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

        After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.