Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPhelps, Johanna
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-15T10:43:07Z
dc.date.available2021-03-15T10:43:07Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/47260
dc.description.abstractThis book invites readers to reconsider how writing studies researchers work with Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) on behalf of their communities and argues that engaging with IRBs during the research design process helps practitioners conduct research more quickly and effectively. Using empirical data from both writing studies and extra-disciplinary contexts, Dr. Johanna Phelps presents findings from two discipline-wide studies, as well as metadata from two IRBs, to develop a principled engagement framework for writing studies researchers to interact with their communities. Phelps further examines the many facets of conducting research with human participants—from comprehending federal policy updates to pondering specific ethical issues to developing detailed research designs—and explores the confluence of ethics, policy, and methodology in a thoroughgoing philosophical investigation of writing studies as a public good. This engaging and timely exploration of research design will be an important resource for scholars and students of writing studies; rhetoric and composition; technical and professional communication; cultural rhetoric; literacy studies; research design; research methodologies; research ethics; IRBs; justice; and critical theory.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JN Education::JNM Higher education, tertiary educationen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JN Education::JNA Philosophy and theory of educationen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JN Educationen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::G Reference, Information and Interdisciplinary subjects::GT Interdisciplinary studies::GTC Communication studiesen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CB Language: reference and general::CBV Creative writing and creative writing guidesen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics::CFG Semantics, discourse analysis, stylisticsen_US
dc.subject.otherCommunities, Design, Engaging, Ethics, Johanna, Phelps, Policy, Public, Research, Studies, Writingen_US
dc.titleChapter 4 Don’t be too WEIRD: Research for the Future of Writing Studiesen_US
dc.typechapter
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bben_US
oapen.relation.isPartOfBook48fdf763-3c22-4511-881d-e39afc1e5217en_US
oapen.relation.isFundedBy8ff247ec-aef2-483d-9946-0bcebaa785fcen_US
oapen.relation.isbn9780367534585en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9780367534608en_US
oapen.imprintRoutledgeen_US
oapen.pages27en_US
peerreview.anonymitySingle-anonymised
peerreview.idbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityPublisher
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.review.typeProposal
peerreview.reviewer.typeInternal editor
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.titleProposal review
oapen.review.commentsTaylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required).


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record