Drones and Support for the Use of Force
External Review of Whole Manuscript
| dc.contributor.author | Walsh, James Igoe | |
| dc.contributor.author | Schulzke, Marcus | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-23T05:34:01Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-09-23T05:34:01Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.identifier | OCN: 1041229289 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/50678 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Drones and Support for the Use of Force utilizes experimental research to analyze the effects of combat drones on Americans' support for the use of force. The authors develop expectations drawn from social science theory and then assess these conjectures using a series of survey experiments. Their findings—that drones have had important but nuanced effects on support for the use of force—have implications for democratic control of military action and civil-military relations, and provide insight into how the development and proliferation of current and future military technologies influence the domestic politics of foreign policy. | |
| dc.language | English | |
| dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government::JPQ Central / national / federal government::JPQB Central / national / federal government policies | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | Political Science | |
| dc.subject.other | Public Policy | |
| dc.subject.other | Military Policy | |
| dc.title | Drones and Support for the Use of Force | |
| dc.type | book | |
| oapen.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9946611 | |
| oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | e07ce9b5-7a46-4096-8f0c-bc1920e3d889 | |
| oapen.relation.isFundedBy | b818ba9d-2dd9-4fd7-a364-7f305aef7ee9 | |
| oapen.relation.isbn | 9780472901173 | |
| oapen.collection | Knowledge Unlatched (KU) | |
| oapen.imprint | University of Michigan Press | |
| oapen.identifier | https://openresearchlibrary.org/viewer/175f784d-3e1e-4496-b954-05c74d2e9bd4 | |
| oapen.identifier.isbn | 9780472901173 | |
| grantor.number | 102042 | |
| peerreview.anonymity | Double-anonymised | |
| peerreview.id | d98bf225-990a-4ac4-acf4-fd7bf0dfb00c | |
| peerreview.open.review | No | |
| peerreview.publish.responsibility | Scientific or Editorial Board | |
| peerreview.review.decision | Yes | |
| peerreview.review.stage | Pre-publication | |
| peerreview.review.type | Full text | |
| peerreview.reviewer.type | External peer reviewer | |
| peerreview.title | External Review of Whole Manuscript | |
| oapen.review.comments | The proposal was selected by the acquisitions editor who invited a full manuscript. The full manuscript was reviewed by two external readers using a double-blind process. Based on the acquisitions editor recommendation, the external reviews, and their own analysis, the Executive Committee (Editorial Board) of U-M Press approved the project for publication. |