Logo Oapen
  • Join
    • Deposit
    • For Librarians
    • For Publishers
    • For Researchers
    • Funders
    • Resources
    • OAPEN
        View Item 
        •   OAPEN Home
        • View Item
        •   OAPEN Home
        • View Item
        JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

        Production, perception, and comprehension of subphonemic detail

        Word-Final /s/ in English

        Thumbnail
        Download PDF Viewer
        Author(s)
        Schmitz, Dominic
        Collection
        Knowledge Unlatched (KU); Language Science Press 2021 - 2023
        Language
        English
        Show full item record
        Abstract
        The complexities of speech production, perception, and comprehension are enormous. Theoretical approaches of these complexities most recently face the challenge of accounting for findings on subphonemic differences. The aim of the present dissertation is to establish a robust foundation of findings on such subphonemic differences. One rather popular case for differences in subphonemic detail is word-final /s/ and /z/ in English (henceforth S) as it constitutes a number of morphological functions. Using word-final S, three general issues are investigated. First, are there subphonemic durational differences between different types of word-final S? If there are such differences, how can they be accounted for? Second, can such subphonemic durational differences be perceived? Third, do such subphonemic durational differences influence the comprehension of S? These questions are investigated by five highly controlled studies: a production task, an implementation of Linear Discriminative Learning, a same-different task, and two number-decision tasks. Using not only real words but also pseudowords as target items, potentially confounding effects of lexical storage are controlled for. Concerning the first issue, the results show that there are indeed durational differences between different types of word-final S. Non-morphemic S is longest in duration, clitic S is shortest in duration, and plural S duration is in-between non-morphemic S and clitic S durations. It appears that the durational differences are connected to a word’s semantic activation diversity and its phonological certainty. Regarding the second issue, subphonemic durational differences in word-final S can be perceived, with higher levels of perceptibility for differences of 35 ms and higher. In regard to the third issue, subphonemic durational differences are found not to influence the speed of comprehension, but show a significant effect on the process of comprehension. The overall results give raise to a revision of various extant models of speech production, perception, and comprehension.
        URI
        https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/60559
        Keywords
        Language Arts & Disciplines; Linguistics
        DOI
        10.5281/zenodo.7267830
        ISBN
        9783961104017, 9783985540594, 9783961104017
        Publisher
        Language Science Press
        Publisher website
        https://langsci-press.org/
        Publication date and place
        2022
        Imprint
        Language Science Press
        Classification
        Linguistics
        Rights
        https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
        • Harvested from KU

        Browse

        All of OAPENSubjectsPublishersLanguagesCollections

        My Account

        LoginRegister

        Export

        Repository metadata
        Logo Oapen
        • For Librarians
        • For Publishers
        • For Researchers
        • Funders
        • Resources
        • OAPEN

        Newsletter

        • Subscribe to our newsletter
        • view our news archive

        Follow us on

        License

        • If not noted otherwise all contents are available under Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

        Credits

        • logo EU
        • This project received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 683680, 810640, 871069 and 964352.

        OAPEN is based in the Netherlands, with its registered office in the National Library in The Hague.

        Director: Niels Stern

        Address:
        OAPEN Foundation
        Prins Willem-Alexanderhof 5
        2595 BE The Hague
        Postal address:
        OAPEN Foundation
        P.O. Box 90407
        2509 LK The Hague

        Websites:
        OAPEN Home: www.oapen.org
        OAPEN Library: library.oapen.org
        DOAB: www.doabooks.org

         

         

        Export search results

        The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Differen formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

        A logged-in user can export up to 15000 items. If you're not logged in, you can export no more than 500 items.

        To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

        After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.